As FBI fans, we’ve watched Maggie Bell (played by Missy Peregrym) and Omar Adom “OA” Zidan (played by Zeeko Zaki) build one of the most compelling partnerships in procedural TV. They are a duo who communicate seamlessly without speaking, share a deep emotional connection, and have each other’s backs through thick and thin. But as Season 7 begins to hint at a potential romance between the two, we, as fans, can’t help but ask: Do we really need it?
The short answer? No. Not right now.
Why Maggie and OA Don’t Need Romance
The beauty of Maggie and OA’s relationship lies in the fact that it isn’t romantic. Their partnership has been built on mutual respect, shared experiences, and emotional vulnerability. From the very beginning, they’ve been through difficult cases together, had each other’s backs, and built a bond of trust that has made them stand out as one of the strongest platonic relationships on TV.
Injecting romance into the equation would undermine all of that. While “will they/won’t they” plots can add intrigue, it’s easy for them to slip into cliché territory. Romance can lead to jealousy plots, unnecessary drama, and potentially derail the deep emotional connection that Maggie and OA have cultivated over seasons. They don’t need romantic tension to remain interesting—their partnership is already compelling enough.
The Pitfalls of Romanticizing Their Dynamic
Let’s take a moment to think about other shows that have attempted to mix professional partnerships with romantic plots, only to see their magic lost in translation. Remember Bones, Castle, and The X-Files? All of these shows had male-female leads with incredible chemistry, and while their romantic developments brought in viewers, they also led to repetitive plots and, in some cases, a loss of the dynamic that initially made the show engaging.
For FBI, Maggie and OA’s relationship works because it’s grounded in trust and emotional support—not romantic desire. Introducing romance could risk turning their story into a typical drama, leaving behind the complexity that has made their friendship so powerful.
Chemistry Doesn’t Have to Mean Romance
It’s important to acknowledge that Maggie and OA have undeniable chemistry. But chemistry doesn’t have to translate into romance. Some of the best TV couples don’t need to kiss or date to have deep, emotionally charged relationships. Think of Mulder and Scully before they became romantically involved on The X-Files or the iconic friendship between The West Wing’s Josh and Donna. Those relationships were built on respect, loyalty, and shared history, and that’s what made them so impactful.
For Maggie and OA, their chemistry is built on years of working side by side, handling stressful situations, and supporting one another. Their bond doesn’t need a romantic layer to be emotionally satisfying. In fact, introducing romance could cheapen what has been built thus far.
Fans Want Depth, Not Drama
The “will they/won’t they” trope has been overused in television. Fans don’t need another forced romantic subplot to feel invested in Maggie and OA’s story. We’re drawn to their bond because of the depth they share—not because of the anticipation of a kiss. They’ve shown us that two people can have a meaningful, life-changing connection without the need to throw romance into the mix. Their dynamic has been more powerful because it’s rooted in professionalism, mutual respect, and the unspoken understanding that they can rely on each other no matter what.
What Could Happen If They Cross the Line?
If Maggie and OA were to become a couple, what would it mean for the story? Would viewers care more about their personal drama than their cases? Would we still be invested in the team dynamic if romance was front and center?
Once romantic tension enters the equation, it’s difficult to go back to what made their partnership special. If they get together, could there be future problems like jealousy, miscommunication, or career disruptions? It’s hard to imagine Maggie and OA being the same after a shift like that, and there’s a risk that their relationship might lose some of its emotional weight and depth.
The Risk of Losing Their Special Dynamic
We all know that procedural TV shows thrive on compelling relationships, but those relationships don’t always need to be romantic. Maggie and OA’s platonic bond has been one of the most emotionally resonant partnerships on the show, and there’s no need to ruin that by throwing in a romance for the sake of drama.
Maggie and OA don’t need to be romantically involved to be interesting. They are already compelling because of their unique dynamic and the powerful emotional connection they share. If the writers move forward with a romance, it risks losing everything that has made their relationship special—and that’s a real loss for fans.
The Writers’ Opportunity to Explore Different Dynamics
Instead of turning Maggie and OA into a couple, the writers could deepen their emotional connection in other ways. We could see more personal backstories, moments of vulnerability, or storylines that test their loyalty without relying on romance. There are so many ways to explore their relationship without making it about a romantic subplot, and doing so would only enhance the strength of their bond.
Conclusion: Keep Maggie and OA’s Relationship Pure
We’re not saying that FBI can’t have romantic relationships on the show, but Maggie and OA’s partnership is something special. They don’t need romance to carry their story forward. Their chemistry, emotional depth, and shared experiences are enough to keep us invested in their journey.
So, let’s keep Maggie and OA as the ultimate team. Their bond doesn’t need to be romantic to be powerful, and we’ll always remember what makes their partnership one of the best in television.